<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cut the CUT TO:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/09/cut-the-cut-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/09/cut-the-cut-to/</link>
	<description>Making sure your screenplay doesn&#039;t leave you stranded</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Mayes</title>
		<link>http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/09/cut-the-cut-to/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Mayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptwrecked.com/?p=1230#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Hey Kevin, thanks for the feedback. Glad you found the article to be helpful. Screenwriting is tricky business. There are all kinds of little arcane, almost insider secrets that you only discover as you go along. I&#039;m hoping this blog will save writers all the time it took me to learn this stuff. Good for you for asking questions and taking the initiative. I would also recommend this article for one other questionable thing that Final Draft does by default: 

http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/12/discontinue-contd/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kevin, thanks for the feedback. Glad you found the article to be helpful. Screenwriting is tricky business. There are all kinds of little arcane, almost insider secrets that you only discover as you go along. I&#8217;m hoping this blog will save writers all the time it took me to learn this stuff. Good for you for asking questions and taking the initiative. I would also recommend this article for one other questionable thing that Final Draft does by default: </p>
<p><a href="http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/12/discontinue-contd/" rel="nofollow">http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/12/discontinue-contd/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/09/cut-the-cut-to/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptwrecked.com/?p=1230#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very new to all of this, so when I got Final Draft 8, it said it&#039;s the leading software for Hollywood script writing. So I&#039;m writing my screenplay and it puts in CUT TO: in there all the time. I&#039;m teaching myself how to do this, never had a teacher or school learning how to do this. So I have a friend that is in his second semester of film school and I show him a little of what I had finished. And what he told me is almost word for word what this topic says. And of course, after I go back through like 30 pages of it removing all the CUT TO:&#039;s it does appear better. SO I do agree with this, even though I don&#039;t even know half the stuff I&#039;m going to... Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very new to all of this, so when I got Final Draft 8, it said it&#8217;s the leading software for Hollywood script writing. So I&#8217;m writing my screenplay and it puts in CUT TO: in there all the time. I&#8217;m teaching myself how to do this, never had a teacher or school learning how to do this. So I have a friend that is in his second semester of film school and I show him a little of what I had finished. And what he told me is almost word for word what this topic says. And of course, after I go back through like 30 pages of it removing all the CUT TO:&#8217;s it does appear better. SO I do agree with this, even though I don&#8217;t even know half the stuff I&#8217;m going to&#8230; Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#8217;s Updates: 12 December 2009 &#171; Scriptwriting Library</title>
		<link>http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/09/cut-the-cut-to/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week&#8217;s Updates: 12 December 2009 &#171; Scriptwriting Library</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptwrecked.com/?p=1230#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; The First Sequence by Doug Eboch/Let&#8217;s Schmooze Be Specific by Your Screenplay Sucks Cut the Cut To by Trevor Mayes/Scriptwrecked Edgy Screenwriting (2B): 13 Ways to Kill your Hero by Trevor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #F5EABD; padding:10px;">
<p>[...] &#8211; The First Sequence by Doug Eboch/Let&#8217;s Schmooze Be Specific by Your Screenplay Sucks Cut the Cut To by Trevor Mayes/Scriptwrecked Edgy Screenwriting (2B): 13 Ways to Kill your Hero by Trevor [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Mayes</title>
		<link>http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/09/cut-the-cut-to/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Mayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptwrecked.com/?p=1230#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Glad you agree Brian. Thanks for the feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you agree Brian. Thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://scriptwrecked.com/2009/12/09/cut-the-cut-to/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptwrecked.com/?p=1230#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I agree on the use of CUT TO: I&#039;m not sure why people feel the need to superfluously use that one above all others, but I see it really really often in spec scripts. It&#039;s a camera direction, and just like all others, it A. shouldn&#039;t be used at all really, and B. is unnecessary given the fact that if you&#039;re cutting to a new location, then the location header should take care of that anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the use of CUT TO: I&#8217;m not sure why people feel the need to superfluously use that one above all others, but I see it really really often in spec scripts. It&#8217;s a camera direction, and just like all others, it A. shouldn&#8217;t be used at all really, and B. is unnecessary given the fact that if you&#8217;re cutting to a new location, then the location header should take care of that anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

