Subscribe to feed via email:
Subscribe RSS
Discontinue CONT’D Dec 12

The Continuing Use of CONT’D

I’m still seeing a ton of people using “(CONT’D)” unnecessarily in their scripts, so it’s time for a quick rant post.

In years past, it was common to use “(CONT’D)” whenever a character’s dialogue was broken by action or scene description. For example:

FRAZZLED TEACHER

Who can tell me how many human blood types there are?

Dracula Jr. raises his hand.

FRAZZLED TEACHER (CONT’D)

Anyone else?

The “(CONT’D)” above is completely unnecessary these days.

The Hollywood StandardWhitespace is Good

Anytime you can eliminate something and gain more whitespace, that’s a good thing. It makes the script feel lighter and easier to read.

Many screenwriting programs will have the “(CONT’D)” enabled by default, so you’ll have to turn that option off. For example, in Final Draft, you would go to Document -> “Mores and Continueds…” Then deselect the “Automatic Character Continueds” option.

The Exceptions

It’s still important to leave the bottom of the page: “(MORE)” and the top of the page: “(CONT’D)” in place, wherever a dialogue block breaks onto the next page.

And if you’re writing a shooting script, you would still use CONTINUEDs for scene breaks across pages.

Also, this rule only applies to film writing. If you’re writing a spec script for a television show, be sure to follow the established guidelines (i.e. half hour television shows would still typically use “(CONT’D)”).

More Information

If you’d like to continue your investigation into “CONT’D” and its various uses, I highly recommend Christopher Riley’s book: The Hollywood Standard: The Complete and Authoritative Guide to Script Format and Style

In it, he goes so far as to say (in bold):

Marking continuing speeches is no longer standard practice in Hollywood and hasn’t been for at least 20 years.

That sounds pretty decisive.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Be Sociable, Share!
Category: Formatting, Style
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
3 Responses
  1. […] Discontinue Cont’d by Trevor Mayes/Scriptwrecked E.T. Analysis Part 5 – The Dinner Table Scene and End of Act I by Doug Eboch/Let’s Schmooze Scene Description Spotlight: Alien by Scott Myers/Go Into The Story Question: How to handle insert shots? by Scott Myers/Go Into The Story Using Numbers in Your Dialogue by Trevor Mayes/Scriptwrecked On the physics of space battles by John August Great Scene: It’s a wonderful life by Scott Myers/Go Into The Story E.T. Analysis Part 6 – The Beginning of Act Two by Doug Eboch/Let’s Schmooze Question: How to handle a character who changes names? by Scott Myers/Go Into The Story Question: Does a story absolutely need an anatagonist? by Scott Myers/Go Into The Story […]

  2. Kevin says:

    Thank you Trevor, Very helpful. Maybe one day I’ll actually see my name on the screen

    Screenplay By

    Kevin W. Banker

    That looks pretty cool!

    Sorry I just went to a happy place just then… LOL

  3. Trevor Mayes says:

    Hey, someone’s name has to be up on the big screen. Might as well be yours!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*