At the Great American PitchFest 2012, I attended four free classes. In my last post, I discussed the class that dealt with selling your script. Today’s post gives you the deets on screenwriting contests, courtesy of the following panel:
- Joan Wai (The Nicholl Fellowships)
- Chadwick Clough (Script Pipeline)
- Howard Casner (Slamdance)
- Clea Frost (CineStory)
The free class was called: “Screenplay Competitions – How to Win, Why Enter & How They Can Change Your Life”
That sounded like a something I needed to check out! Here are some of the things I learned:
- Each of the top competitions receive anywhere from 5,000 to 7,000+ scripts (The Nicholl receives the most). CineStory receives only about 600 scripts (so the chances of winning are greater).
- For the Nicholl competition, even the quarterfinalists will get contacted by producers, managers, etc.
- It’s a misconception that companies are getting rich off of holding screenwriting competitions. Everyone on the panel genuinely scoffed at that idea.
- A common script concept this year has been: “Senior citizens on the run.”
- A common story conceit has been an opening where a young woman is staggering through the woods, then we flash back to how she got there (or it ends up being a dream).
- If you want to see how screenwriting contests stack up, head over to MovieBytes.com. The site features user-submitted reviews and ratings for each competition.
The question and answer period was especially enlightening. Here are some good ones (all paraphrased):
Q. Is it a good idea to resubmit the same script two years in a row?
A. If it’s been substantially rewritten, then yes. If it hasn’t been rewritten, the answer was mixed. Most judges seemed to think that it was a bad idea to resubmit the same script, however Joan Wai related a story about a writer who submitted the exact same script a second year in a row and ended up winning a Nicholl fellowship!
It was also noted that quite often competitions will have about 50% new judges from year to year, so it may pay to resubmit if you feel that your script was misunderstood. Until robots get into the game, judging will continue to be subjective. But the bottom line is that everyone’s looking for a great script.
Q. Has the advent of screenwriting software improved the quality of scripts over the years?
A. “They’re just as bad, but better written.” – Howard Casner
Note: He said it jokingly, but there was truth behind it. Of all the panelists, his passion for finding innovative scripts and quality writing was probably the most evident.
Q. What’s the percentage of scripts that are good?
A. The general consensus seemed to be about 1 in 20. (Note: At the previous panel discussion of script consultants, they said about 1 in 100. Perhaps the quality of writing is better for competitions than it is in general.)
Q. Is there an advantage to submitting your script earlier versus later in the competition cycle?
A. Obviously it’s cheaper if you submit your script earlier, but most seemed to think there was no real advantage. However, one judge admitted that they tend to get tougher on scripts as the competition goes on. But that is balanced out by the fact that later in the competition, a really good script might be fresher in their minds when it comes time to fight over the finalists.
They also agreed that it’s probably not such a great idea to submit your script right at the very last possible minute. It’ll still get read fairly in their contests, but in less reputable contests, it may not get read with as much vigor or interest.
What are your thoughts on screenwriting contests? Any success stories out there?
This is Howard Casner. Just wanted to say thanks for the nice mention. I do try to find innovative and different scripts. I’m glad it came through.
Hey, my pleasure Howard. Thanks for the note and for stopping by the site. I’m glad there are people like you and contests like Slamdance out there for screenwriters. All the best!